Posted on March 9, Well, the Falklands seems to be popping up in the news every so often now. Back infew people anywhere knew where the Falkland Islands were let alone how contentious they were. Anyone interested in current affairs in that Hemisphere could benefit from knowing a little about the history there. If someone is interested in military history or, more important still, if someone is in the military, then I think that war is very relevant today.
D in neurophysiology Slavery and the Civil War: In that conflict more thansoldiers were killed or wounded in four years of hellish war. To place this in perspective consider that the entire population of the United States at war's end was 35 million, putting war casualties at nearly two percent of the total populace.
Equivalent rates of casualties today would result in five million dead or wounded, dwarfing our losses in World War II, or any other war. Why did two percent of our population suffer death or maiming?
Over the issue of state sovereignty and the interpretation of the Tenth Amendment ratified in The text is simple enough: That "terrible cause" of the South is usually thought of as the defense of slavery. This is what we are all taught in school; and the idea is strongly entrenched today.
He concludes that the "Civil War was about slavery, nothing more. Yes, slavery was of course the central point of contention, but as an example of state sovereignty versus federal authority.
The war was fought over state's rights and the limits of federal power in a union of states. The perceived threat to state autonomy became an existential one through the specific dispute over slavery.
The issue was not slavery per se, but who decided whether slavery was acceptable, local institutions or a distant central government power. That distinction is not one of semantics: Specifically, eleven southern states seceded from the Union in protest against federal legislation that limited the expansion of slavery claiming that such legislation violated the tenth amendment, which they argued trumped the Supremacy Clause.
The war was indeed about protecting the institution of slavery, but only as a specific case of a state's right to declare a federal law null and void. Southern states sought to secede because they believed that the federal government had no authority to tell them how to run their affairs.
The most obvious and precipitating example was the North's views on slavery. So yes, the South clearly fought to defend slavery as a means of protecting their sordid economic system and way of life, but they did so with slavery serving as the most glaring example of federal usurpation of state powers of self-determination.
The war would be fought to prevent those states from seceding, not to destroy the institution of slavery.
|ELECTION RESULTS:||Indeed, the book's confusing structure defies efforts to define its meaning at every turn. That said, I think one could say that it is, in fact, an antiwar story, at least for the most part.|
The war would be fought over different interpretations of our founding document. The inherent tension between Article VI and the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution has kept lawyers busy and wealthy from the day the words were penned, and the argument goes on today.Reemergence of the “Vanishing Americans” ‐ Native Americans and World War II • Why do you think the Army (or any other military/national security branch) would be • What role do you think secret codes played in World War II?
• Do you think secret codes of . Modern war is usually war of attrition, and is hard to justify morally.
I think that there are occasionally situations where war is justified, but the practice of war, the execution, ends up being a very ugly affair for those involved.
Aug 14, · For me the only cause of the war are the political caninariojana.comcal people must be the rapresentative of nation but when they have a power,they think to resolve their problem in first and after they believe to be powerful and everything and everybody are of their possesion But it is strong!!!
21 Replies to “Do you think anyone is regretting putting their name on this list about now?” Anonymous November 7, at am. No. Kristi only won by a few percentage points so let’s not pretend that this was a blowout and people should be shamed or embarrassed for supporting Sutton.
Apr 14, · The war was indeed about protecting the institution of slavery, but only as a specific case of a state's right to declare a federal law null and void.
Southern states sought to secede because they. Do you think that the U.S. policy of Containment was a good idea. Try to list one way in which it may have been beneficial, and one way (at least for each) that it worked against U.S.
interests? After playing the Prisoner's dilemma do you have a better understanding of how important war games were/are to defense strategy?